Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barsana Dham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Some improvement made in terms of sourcing, article still needs significant cleanup though.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 03:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Barsana Dham

Barsana Dham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete Not notable. OR and not referenced. ADVERTISEMENT. Wikidās ॐ 08:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. -- Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 09:54, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete. Clearly a good bit of work has been put into this article, but the subject does not meet WP:NOT. Article is largely an essay and self-promotion.  Frank  |  talk  22:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete. Not notable. 86.40.196.166 (talk) 20

32, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep. The article is verifiable, and although there are issues with the promotional tone, the overall coverage of the temple itself seems enough to satisfy notability. The founder himself may be more notable than the temple, but both seem to satisfy the notability criteria. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:52, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

• Keep. Largest Hindu temple in the US looks like notable enough. Needs cleanup. - Nabla (talk) 00:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.